Wasn't that nice Mr Obama a sweetie, the
way he tried to help our Dave end the war in the Tory party while he was over
in Washington this week?
Mind you, given how little the President
has managed to do to end the war in Syria, I don't much rate his chances with
the fundamentalist rebels of the Conservative party. Never mind, I still think
it was jolly nice of him to try.
The truth, though, is that the coalition is
crumbling. No, not the Tory-Lib Dem coalition -- that's in fine fettle compared
to the one I'm thinking of: the ramshackle, increasingly dysfunctional bunch of
lemmings we know and love as the Conservative party.
In the words of Benedict Brogan, deputy
editor of the Daily Telegraph (yes, the paper better known as the Torygraph),
writing on his blog on Tuesday: "The Tories look like a bunch of
self-indulgent lunatics."
President Obama tip-toed through the Tory
euro-minefield with considerable skill, I thought -- it does make some sense,
he suggested, to seek to mend a relationship before breaking it off. And that,
of course, is pretty much what Mr Cameron says he wants to do with the EU:
renegotiate, and then call the referendum.
There's a problem, though. When one party
in a relationship threatens week after week, year after year: "Unless you
change the way you behave, I'm not going to be able to carry on like
this," there is a real chance that one day the inevitable reply will be:
"Fine, perhaps you'd better move out."
But if David Cameron's poll ratings are
sliding down the plug-hole, it's not because voters disagree with him about
exactly when to hold that wretched referendum. It's because he's looking
increasingly like a weak prime minister unable to control his own party, an old
Etonian toff who's no longer even capable of organising cocktails and canapés
in a Notting Hill nosherie.
It's as if Tory MPs have clean forgotten
what they were told back in 2006 to explain why they hadn't won any elections
for a decade. "Instead of talking about the things that most people care
about, we talked about what we cared about most. While parents worried about
childcare, getting the kids to school, balancing work and family life, we were
banging on about Europe." The man who told it to them straight? Er, their
party leader, a certain D Cameron.
We've been here before, of course. John
Major went through exactly the same agonies, facing exactly the same
euro-obsessives, and we know what happened to him. This time, though, unlike in
1997, it may not be Labour who reap the benefit -- Ed Miliband hasn't got quite
the same effortless TV appeal that Tony Blair mastered so skillfully -- so it
may well be Nigel Farage and UKIP who stand to gain the most.
When the prime minister unveiled his
"in-out referendum" strategy last January, I wrote: "There is a
strong possibility that David Cameron, in one single, ill-considered,
badly-timed and unnecessary speech, may have sown the seeds of his own
downfall."
My argument then was that all of the likely
election outcomes in 2015, the least likely was an overall Tory victory that
would enable him to remain in Downing Street. Now, though, I'm beginning to
think his downfall could come even sooner.
It goes like this: the UKIP bandwagon and
the Tory rebellions continue to roll. At the European parliament elections next
year, the UKippers may even get more votes nationwide than the Tories.
(Remember, turn-out for the euro-elections in 2009 was a dismal 34.7 per cent.)
Tory MPs go into full-blown panic mode, just 12 months ahead of the general
election.
The cry goes up: We can't win with Cameron.
(After all, if they could unceremoniously dump Margaret Thatcher in 1990
because they thought she was going to lose them the next election, I don't
imagine they'll have too much trouble jettisoning Mr Cameron.)
And if you think I'm being fanciful:
consider this -- the two Cabinet ministers who so unhelpfully put their heads
above the parapet last weekend to venture that they would vote No in a
referendum if one were held now, just happen to be two of the ministers with
the shortest odds in the betting shop to be the party's next leader. Yes, take
a bow, Michael Gove and Philip Hammond.
You may also like to consider this piece in
this morning's Telegraph: "Michael Gove has said he wants to be 'the heir
to Blair' amid renewed speculation that he could succeed David Cameron as
Conservative leader."
If I were a betting man, I'd put £100 on
Gove for Tory leader before the next election. There again, it may all look
different after the summer.
By the way, don't you think the two Tory
MPs who created so much misery for the prime minister this week, with their EU
referendum amendment ahead of the Queen's Speech vote, Peter Bone and John
Baron, should set up a pub together? "I want a quick chat about Europe --
how about a pint with Farage down the Bone and Baron?"
Margaret Thatcher told David Cameron to become MORE unpopular. It appears the PM has heeded her advice. The only question is: Has the dear man hit the bottom yet?
ReplyDelete