To choose one party leader who makes a catastrophic error of judgement
may be regarded, to borrow from Oscar Wilde, as a misfortune; but to choose
two in quick succession looks like carelessness.
First David Cameron gambled and lost with the Brexit referendum. Now
Theresa May has done the same by calling a wholly unnecessary general election.
What is it with these people? Do the words hubris and nemesis mean nothing to
them?
Thank you, young voters, who seem to have woken from their Brexit
nightmare and flocked to the polling stations. (According to Lord Ashcroft’s
post-election survey, two-thirds of voters aged 18-24 voted Labour.)
Thank you, fellow Remainers, who seem to have decided, despite the
confused message from party leaders, that Labour was their best chance of
softening the terms of the UK’s departure from the EU. (According to Ashcroft,
more than half Remain voters went for Labour.)
Thank you, voters in Scotland, who gave the SNP a bloody nose, kicked a
second independence referendum out of sight and thereby saved the Union for the
foreseeable future. (Alex Salmond and Angus Robertson both defeated? Wow …)
And thank you, voters everywhere, who ignored the pundits (yes,
including me), who said Jeremy Corbyn could never be an election winner, and
ignored the right-wing tabloids who spewed their usual poison all over the body
politic. Last night, it most definitely was neither The Sun nor the Daily Mail
what won it.
It is at times like this that I cherish democracy and the determination
of voters to make up their own minds, for their own reasons, how to cast their
votes.
Back
in April, when Mrs May announced the snap election, I recalled the fate of
Edward Heath in 1974, when he called an election to answer the question ‘Who governs
Britain?’ and received, much to his surprise, the answer ‘Not you, matey.’ Mrs
May may think that she can hang on as a busted flush PM (does she really think
that her harping on about the need for ‘stability’ convinces anyone at all?),
but she must know that her days are numbered.
The election result was an unusually personal defeat
for the prime minister: the Tory campaign was built around her, and her alone,
to a ridiculous degree. The Tory manifesto offered nothing of note save the
unlamented ‘dementia tax’, and the party’s messaging barely included even the
party’s name.
Contrary-wise, the result was a personal triumph for
Jeremy Corbyn. He stuck to his guns, remained true to himself, and allowed
himself to be steered into a commanding position at the head of an impressively
effective campaign. (According to Ashcroft, more than half of Labour’s voters
made up their minds after the campaign had started. So goodbye to the notion
that campaigns make no difference to the outcome.)
But once the Labour cheers have died down (after all,
they still didn’t win), and the Tory tears have dried, one huge black cloud
remains casting a pall over Westminster. What happens now to Brexit?
Theresa May wanted a strong Brexit mandate. Instead, she has
emerged weakened and humiliated. Jeremy Corbyn wanted … well, to this day, I’m
still not sure what he wanted. In theory, formal negotiations begin in less
than two weeks’ time. Good luck with that, to whoever has to pretend to be
representing Britain.
It is not entirely fanciful to see the election
result, at least in part, as the Revenge of the Remainers. If all those young
voters yesterday had turned out for the referendum, things would be looking
very different.
So: before long, a new Conservative party leader. A
rethought approach to Brexit. Perhaps even a cross-party negotiating committee?
And an entirely new political landscape.
Back to a two-party system. A re-energised youth vote.
A much diminished nationalism in both Scotland and the UKIP heartlands of
England.
Don’t anyone dare tell me that politics is boring.
And in case you were wondering, yes, I have already applied to join the International Federation of Hat-Eaters, but I’m told there is a huge waiting list. In the circumstances, it's hardly surprising.
So, Conservatives are to go from their effort of co-opting UKIP to forming a government with another nation's faction distinguished for not wishing to break with the UK and representing a populace known for not wishing to break with the EU. And this is to produce stability with two votes to spare… hmm. Oh, and how did that coalition work for LibDems again? When Corbyn said Conservatives are all about the Party, he nailed it. Cue the next election.
ReplyDelete