Guess
what: we still haven't left the European Union. And if you were naïvely hoping
that over the summer, someone, somewhere would have worked out how the UK might
be able to negotiate a new relationship with its neighbours without inflicting
immense harm on its own citizens, well, sorry, but dream on.
The government is at war with itself. Even the
department in charge of extricating us from the EU is apparently at war with
itself. There are also ominous rumblings suggesting tensions between some EU
capitals and the European Commission. If I didn't know better, I'd say it could
hardly get any worse.
So here's what I suggest. Ignore the lot of them. My
hunch is that between now and March 2019, there'll be sound and fury galore,
accusations and counter-accusations, insults flying in all directions -- and
then at the last minute, there'll be agreement on a status quo transition deal
which will allow the talks to continue until everyone drops dead of boredom. (And
no, I don't think Theresa May will still be prime minister.)
If you need something to fret about -- and God knows,
there's no shortage of reasons to be fretful -- fret about North Korea. Or the
appalling atrocities being perpetrated against the Rohingya Muslims in Burma,
under the distressingly disengaged gaze of Aung San Suu Kyi.
Fret about the fearsome hurricanes in the Caribbean
and southern United States. Or the terrible floods in India, Nepal and
Bangladesh, where hundreds of people have died and millions have had to flee
from their homes. Or the unimaginable suffering of the people of Yemen, victims
of a virtually unreported war, waged in part with weapons sold to Saudi Arabia
by the UK.
If ever the world needed political leaders with the
wisdom, judgement and determination to work together for the betterment of us
all, it is now. Instead, we are led by a clutch of politicians characterised by
either extreme narcissism, ignorance, megalomania or sheer incompetence. (Match
the descriptions to the names: Donald Trump, Kim Jong-un, Xi Jinping, Theresa
May.)
If they all turned up on a desert island for a reality
TV show, you'd avert your gaze in embarrassment. With the possible exceptions
of the French president, Emmanuel Macron, the German chancellor, Angela Merkel,
and the Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau, the world's leaders give every
impression of being utterly overwhelmed by the scale of the challenges they
face.
(I don't know about you, but I still haven't forgotten
Donald Trump's breathtaking remark last April: 'This is more work than in my
previous life. I thought it would be easier.')
Our leaders belong on reality TV. Donald Trump was
created, nurtured and promoted by TV -- and now along comes Jacob Rees-Mogg,
another two-bit entertainer masquerading as a politician. Hey, folks, look at
me -- I'm different, I'm entertaining. Vote for The Entertainer because he's
not like the rest of them. Who cares about his views?
You think I exaggerate? At the Edinburgh TV festival
last month, the head of CNN International, Tony Maddox, said this: '[Trump] is
good for business ... Our performance has been enhanced during this news
period.' Last year, Les Moonves of the US TV network CBS (salary last year:
$69.6 million) said Trump 'may not be good for America, but he's damn good for
CBS.'
Matt Taibbi put it well in Rolling Stone magazine: 'Donald Trump gets awesome ratings for the
same reason Fear Factor made money
feeding people rat-hair tortilla chips: nothing sells like a freak show.'
So there you have it: voters are increasingly attracted
to what's unusual, different, and entertaining.
Who wants 'strong and stable' in an age when disgust with conventional
politicians runs so deep? Jeremy Corbyn is hardly a freak, but nor is he
conventional, hence his appeal.
The people to blame are the traditional politicians.
They failed to notice that the banks were driving the global economy headlong towards
the precipice, and then they glibly presided over a decade of stagnating wages
disguised as 'we're all in this together' austerity.
In the US, Hillary Clinton gave the impression that
the Presidency was hers by right; in the UK, David Cameron blundered into a
referendum that he lazily assumed he was bound to win, and then ran for the
hills when he lost. His successor, Theresa May, called an election when there
was no need, waged the worst campaign in living memory, and now seems to think
she can carry on as if it was a triumph.
The thing about reality TV is that it isn't real, even
though it pretends to be. The world's problems, on the other hand, are very
definitely real, which is why it would be nice to have some more grown-ups in
charge.
A political world in which clowns like Boris Johnson
and Jacob Rees-Mogg can be seriously spoken of as potential prime ministers is
a world in which the nursery is mistaken for the university library. Any day
now, I expect Liam Fox to throw his toys out of his playpen. It'll probably be
entertaining, if nothing else.
-->
Excellent piece, thank you. I'm just hoping that university libraries aren't becoming nurseries as the new zero-hours/hot-desking/money-incentivised/corporate culture takes hold
ReplyDeleteThe late Aldous Huxley got it pretty much pinned down in his essays - Brave New World Revisited. Written in 1958, though you'd think it was yesterday. Look at this:
ReplyDelete"Used in one way, the press, the radio and the cinema are indispensable to the survival of democracy. Used in another way, they are among the most powerful weapons in the dictator's armory. In the field of mass communications as in almost every other field of enterprise, technological progress has hurt the Little Man and helped the Big Man. (…....) In regard to propaganda the early advocates of universal literacy and a free press envisaged only two possibilities: the propaganda might be true, or it might be false. They did not foresee what in fact has happened, above all in our Western capitalist democracies - the development of a vast mass communications industry, concerned in the main neither with the true nor the false, but with the unreal, the more or less totally irrelevant. In a word, they failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions. ….
Your piece articulates my own thoughts, fears and cynicism perfectly. It's something of a relief to see that one is not alone!
ReplyDelete