I strongly suspect that the world would be a much better
place if we journalists were never allowed to go into politics. (Although I
suppose that, if pressed, I might make an exception for Winston Churchill.)
We suffer from an alarming tendency to believe in simple
answers. We prize making an impact over getting things right, and an
off-the-cuff opinion over a considered judgement.
As the American journalist Andrew Ferguson put it many years
ago: 'Journalism is a character defect. ... It is a life lived at a safe
remove: standing off to one side of the parade as it passes, noting its flaws,
offering glib and unworkable suggestions for its improvement. Every journalist
must know that this is not, really, how a serious-minded person would choose to
spend his days.'
Ouch. A good journalist might know how to ask the right
questions, but a good politician knows how to find the right answers. There's a
big difference.
Exhibit One: Toby Young, former provocateur extraordinaire, a man so proud of his ability to get up
people's noses that he wrote a book called 'How to lose friends and alienate
people'. It was later made into a film, but it demonstrated, as Young continued
to do for many years, an unusual knack for being both offensive and wrong.
If that's how you get your kicks, fine. But as Young has
belatedly discovered, it becomes a bit of a problem if you then try to reinvent
yourself as a serious educational reformer with ideas that deserve to be
listened to by policy-makers. What seemed clever when you were in the losing
friends business risks backfiring when you start trying to win allies.
So I'm afraid I have little sympathy now that he has had to
resign as a member of the board of the higher education regulator, the Office
for Students. As a puerile wordsmith, he can comment till he's blue in the face
about women's body shapes (while watching prime minister's questions in 2012,
he tweeted: 'Serious cleavage behind Ed Miliband’s head. Anyone know who it
belongs to?')
He can also, if he insists, be crassly offensive about
people who don't share his superior intellect: 'If Gove is serious about
wanting to bring back O-levels, the Government will have to repeal the
Equalities Act, because any exam that isn’t "accessible" to a
functionally illiterate troglodyte with a mental age of six will be judged to
be "elitist".' But he shouldn't be surprised if some people take such
comments as suggesting that he may not be the ideal person to sit on the board
of an education regulator.
Let's not obsess too much about Toby Young. Exhibits Two and
Three: the Terrible Twins, Michael Gove and Boris Johnson. Both of them former
journalists (Gove at the BBC and The
Times; Johnson at The Times, the Daily Telegraph, and The Spectator), both of them with a marked
talent for bad judgement and a preference for the short-term over the
long-term. Definitely not a good advertisement for the journalist-politician
brand.
Of course, there are exceptions. There always are. Whatever
you think of his, er, whacky views on climate change, no one could argue that
Nigel Lawson (another former editor of The
Spectator) wasn't a serious politician in his time as Margaret Thatcher's
chancellor of the exchequer. Likewise Ed
Balls (former Financial Times leader
writer), notwithstanding his decision to reinvent himself on Strictly Come Dancing.
Michael Foot was a
first-rate journalist (editor of the Evening
Standard at the age of 28) but not such a success as leader of the Labour party; Bill
Deedes, on the other hand, seems to have made a pretty good fist of being both a
Cabinet minister (1962-64) under Harold Macmillan and editor of the Daily Telegraph (1974-86).
Norman Fowler (formerly of The Times) is now Speaker of the House of Lords, so he's done all
right; Ben Bradshaw (BBC) served as culture secretary under Gordon Brown; and
Ruth Davidson (also BBC) is leader of the Scottish Conservatives and
increasingly spoken of as a future party leader, so she's not done too badly
either.
Overall, however, the record is not encouraging for
journalists with political ambitions. Much better to stick to asking questions
rather than trying to answer them, and -- as Toby Young has shown -- indulge
our talent for losing friends rather than try to win allies.
Oh, and a final thought: I feel much the same way about
celebrity-politicians. I suspect I need hardly mention the current occupant of
the White House, but I'd also harbour grave doubts if Oprah Winfrey decided to
try her hand at politics. Being good on TV is not the same as being good at
running a country.
Nor is being good at running a business. Mark Zuckerberg of
Facebook, please note.
1 comment:
Surely, half of all politicians are crap, and half are passably effective - whatever their origins. The problem is that the crap ones tend to float upwards (no apologies for the graphic image)
And I wouldn't rule out Oprah - she has the rare quality among potential politicians of being genuine
JW
Post a Comment