Within the space of just a few hours this week, two Cabinet ministers have had to issue grovelling apologies after spouting gratuitous and offensive insults. A third should have done, but didn’t.
First, the
Northern Ireland secretary Karen Bradley had to grovel after claiming that deaths
caused by British troops and police in Northern Ireland during the Troubles
‘were not crimes’.
Which is
(a) wrong, and (b) about as offensive as it’s possible to be to the families of
those who were killed. Hence the grovel: ‘I am profoundly sorry for the offence
and hurt that my words have caused. The language was wrong and, even though
this was not my intention, it was deeply insensitive to many of those who lost
loved ones.’
(This is
the same Northern Ireland secretary, you may recall, who freely admitted last
year that when she first took the job, she had no idea that nationalists in
the province didn’t vote for unionist parties and vice versa.)
Then Amber
Rudd – a former home secretary, no less, who you might have thought would have
learned something by now about diversity and minorities – somehow managed to
refer to the shadow home secretary Diane Abbott, who is by far the best known
black politician in the country, as ‘coloured’ – an epithet that ceased being
acceptable at about the same time as the Black and White Minstrel Show went out
of fashion.
Ms Abbott
rightly called it ‘an outdated, offensive and revealing choice of words.’ Ms
Rudd immediately apologised for her ‘clumsy language’.
And then –
yes, there’s more – Andrea Leadsom replied to a question in the Commons on
Islamophobia by suggesting that the questioner, Labour frontbencher Naz Shah, should
ask the Foreign Office, which gave the very distinct impression that she regards
Muslims as, well, not really British.
A headline
in The Times sums it all up admirably:
‘One day, three gaffes as ministers offend Irish, blacks and Muslims.'
What is it
with these people? Are they stupid? Careless? Racist? And it’s not just Conservatives,
either – remember the Independent Group and former Labour MP Angela Smith, who
just a couple of weeks ago barely managed to stop herself referring on TV to
people who are ‘black or a funny tinge’?
I recognise
that not everyone chooses their words with as much care as a professional
journalist or broadcaster. Sometimes even the best of people are caught out
when the brain trips up the tongue – as my former colleague Jim Naughtie
notoriously discovered when he mis-spoke the first consonant of Jeremy Hunt’s
surname.
But this
is something different. This is the tongue revealing what the brain forgets to
conceal, or in the case of Karen Bradley, the tongue revealing the gap where
the brain should be.
I think it
also reveals something else. It reveals an appalling level of ignorance about
the world beyond Westminster and the social circles in which too many MPs spend
their lives. And although I hesitate to accuse anyone of bigotry without sufficient
evidence, I think it’s at least arguable that these repeated ‘mis-statements’
or ‘clumsy language’ do reveal attitudes that should have no place in
twenty-first century Britain.
Which
brings us to out-and-out bigotry, against minorities of all descriptions, but
in particular against Jews and Muslims. On Thursday, the equality watchdog, the
Equality and Human Rights Commission, announced that it has embarked on the
first step of a statutory inquiry into whether the Labour party is guilty of
unlawful discrimination against Jews.
This is
serious stuff – because the only previous occasions when it has taken similar
action were when it ordered the British National Party to rewrite its
constitution so as not to contravene race relations legislation, and when it
found that the Metropolitan Police were discriminating against minority ethnic,
gay and female police officers.
On the other side of the political divide, the Conservative
party has now suspended fourteen members who are alleged to have published
Islamophobic comments online. And the Tory party chairman Brandon Lewis has
been accused of failing to act against several other complaints of racism and
Islamophobia.
One Tory activist in Portsmouth, who came to the UK from
Iran forty years ago and whose daughter is a British army officer, was quoted
as saying: ‘People in the party feel able to be as racist as they wish now.’
Hardly surprising, is it, given that it was a former Tory
foreign secretary no less – Boris something? – who wrote in a newspaper column
last year that Muslim women who wear a face-covering veil, or niqab, look like
letter boxes or bank robbers.
Sayeeda Warsi, who was both chairman of the Conservative
party and the first Muslim woman to sit in the Cabinet, has accused Theresa May
of ‘burying her head in the sand’ over the issue. ‘She doesn’t listen, she
fails to acknowledge when there is a problem.’
So is there more Islamophobia in the Conservative party than
antisemitism in the Labour party? I have no idea, and I’m not sure it matters. There
has certainly been much more publicity about Labour’s in-house bigots, but
there is a fairly obvious explanation.
As Jonathan Freedland suggested in The Guardian, it’s probably because ‘people expect much less of the
Tories than they do of an avowedly anti-racist party such as Labour … if the
Tory party is riddled with bigotry towards a minority, it hardly comes as a
surprise.’
What I find so deeply depressing about all this is that it
shines such an unflattering light on politicians and political activists who
claim to be in business to make the UK a better place. If they are harbouring
racists and bigots – and failing to root them out – I dread to think what might
lie in store.
Because if
you think this is just a handful of pathetic bigots sounding off and doing no
real harm, ponder these statistics.
According
to the most recent figures from the Muslim monitoring group Tell Mama, there
were 1,200 verified anti-Muslim attacks in Britain last year, an increase of
more than twenty-five per cent over the previous year and the highest number
since it began recording incidents.
And
according to the Jewish security group the Community Security Trust, there were
more than 1,650 antisemitic incidents over the same period, a sixteen per cent
increase over the previous year.
There
should be no tolerance for bigotry anywhere, whether in the constituency
meeting rooms of our two main political parties or on the streets and online where
thugs think they can attack minorities with impunity.
And
Cabinet ministers should learn how to talk about people who look different,
sound different, or worship differently, without being offensive. It really
isn’t that hard.
No comments:
Post a Comment